Close Date
-
Month
-
Day
Year
2 digit month, 2 digit day, 4 digit year
Date
Professionalising the career path for MPs’ staff
A consultation seeking views on some proposed changes for MPs staff to take effect from April 2026.
This consulatation is now closed
Back
Next
Name
*
First Name
Last Name
Email
*
example@example.com
Are you:
*
MP
Former MP
MPs’ staff member
Government Department
Member of the Public
Statutory Consultee
Other
Confidentiality statement: Do you wish for your response to be kept confidential? Please note, we will summarise the responses we receive when we publish our decisions. In doing so, we may refer to individual respondents and the content of their responses. We will not quote from confidential responses or attribute the views in them to any particular respondent. For more information about what we do with personal data, please see our privacy notice. https://www.theipsa.org.uk/privacy
*
Yes
No
Question 1. Should IPSA revisit the pay ranges once the benchmarking exercise is concluded to ensure more consistent width and overlap between ranges?
Yes
No
Unsure/don't know
(Q1) Please provide further information.
Question 2a. Should IPSA create a minimum pay policy for substantive roles (excluding interns) using an appropriate fixed percentage above the National Living Wage?
Yes
No
Unsure/don't know
(Q2a) Please provide further information.
Question 2b What would you consider an appropriate fixed percentage or metric to be?
Question 3. Is creating an additional leadership level above the three existing job families the right approach?
Yes
No
Unsure/don't know
(Q3) Please provide further information.
Question 4. Should IPSA apply a default to all new contracts created on the online contract generator tool to a 37.5 hour working week with the option to manually override that if a different FTE working week is desired?
Yes
No
Unsure/don't know
(Q4) Please provide further information.
Question 5a. What are your views on creating a ring-fenced budget for staff development and the spend on staff wellbeing and development being published in aggregate?
Question 5b: Do you have any comments about how IPSA can provide more meaningful transparency to staffing funding and how this is used to support MPs’ work?
Question 6a: Do you agree that this approach would ensure that job descriptions would better reflect the reality of working in an MPs’ office? Are there any other changes that would help to achieve this?
Yes
No
Unsure/don't know
(Q6a) Please provide further information.
Question 6b: Is there a need to reduce the number of job titles which can be used under each job role?
Yes
No
(Q6b) Please provide further information.
Question 7a. What are your views around IPSA moving towards a broad competency-based pay progression framework for MPs staffing ?
Question 7b. What are your views on spine point systems in the context of MPs’ staffing?
Question 8a. What are your views on locality-based pay ranges?
Question 8b. Should MPs have discretion to provide ‘high-cost area allowances’ to their staff?
Yes
No
Unsure/don't know
(Q8b) Please provide further information.
Question 9: Are there any areas of possible inequality in the approach we are consulting upon that we should consider? Do you have any views on any other possible equality impacts resulting from the proposals in this consultation?
Thank you for taking the time to complete this survey.
Submit
Should be Empty: